Targeting TLR Signaling Pathways to Blunt Pathogen-mediated Acute Lung Injury

  • Funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Total publications:0 publications

Grant number: 3R01AI125215-04S1

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19, Middle East Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV)
  • Start & end year

    2017
    2022
  • Known Financial Commitments (USD)

    $52,216
  • Funder

    National Institutes of Health (NIH)
  • Principal Investigator

    Pending
  • Research Location

    United States of America
  • Lead Research Institution

    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND BALTIMORE
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Pathogen: natural history, transmission and diagnostics

  • Research Subcategory

    Immunity

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Subject

    Non-Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    N/A

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Not Applicable

  • Vulnerable Population

    Not applicable

  • Occupations of Interest

    Not applicable

Abstract

For decades, a "one bug, one drug" approach has characterized development of vaccines or treatments forspecific infectious diseases. We propose a different approach based on the development of novel treatment ofinfectious diseases by capitalizing on common host innate immune responses that are triggered during infection by influenza and other priority pathogens. Influenza virus infects up to 5 million people yearly worldwide,killing as many as ~500,000. Our strong experimental evidence demonstrates that the potent TLR4 antagonist,Eritoran (Eisai, Inc.), as well as multiple other TLR4 antagonists, significantly decreased both acute lung injury(ALI) and mortality when administered therapeutically to influenza-infected mice. Eritoran not only blocks influenza-mediated release of host-derived "danger-associated molecular patterns" (DAMPs), but also bluntedDAMP-mediated TLR4 signaling in macrophages that normally results in a "cytokine storm." While we haveelucidated several novel mechanisms by which influenza mediates ALI and lethality that are counteracted byEritoran therapy (e.g., release of host-derived DAMPS that signal through TLR4; increased tight-junction permeability leading to pulmonary edema; a role for IL-1α/β in lethality), our understanding of the overall innateimmune signaling pathways that control influenza-induced ALI and Eritoran-mediated protection remains incomplete, necessitating further investigation to develop a highly efficacious host-directed therapy. Therefore,Specific Aim 1 will focus on the identification of innate immune mechanisms that underlie both influenza sensitivity and Eritoran-mediated protection. We will take advantage of genetically modified mouse strains to dissectthe signaling pathways engaged. Whether TLR4 must be expressed on stromal and/or myeloid cells, the roleof virus-induced epithelial cell necroptosis in DAMP release, mechanisms by which non-TLR4 PRRs contributeto influenza resistance/susceptibility, and the possibility that TLR2/TLR4 dimerization is required for the hostresponse to influenza will be evaluated as novel potential mechanisms that can be exploited to enhance therapeutic efficacy. In Specific Aim 2, the therapeutic benefit of a novel IKKβ inhibitor, E6070 (Eisai, Inc.), againstinfluenza, alone or in the presence of current anti-influenza antiviral therapies, will be tested in cotton rats(CR), a second rodent species that permits analysis of ALI in response to infection by non-adapted human influenza isolates. Aim 2 will also compare Eritoran and E6070 in CR in a model of secondary staphylococcal(MRSA) pneumonia following influenza infection. Lastly, we will assess the relative effectiveness of Eritoranand E6070 for the ability to block ALI caused by other clinically important or biothreat pathogens associatedwith ALI in humans (e.g., Francisella tularensis, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Klebsiella pneumoniae, SARS-CoV and MERS-CoV), first in mice, and, if effective, in CR. These experiments will challenge the overarchingcentral hypothesis that TLR antagonists represent broad-based, therapeutic agents that mitigate pathologichost responses to multiple ALI-inducing priority pathogens.