COVID-19: Safety and personalisation for UK maternity care provision during and after a pandemic.

  • Funded by UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
  • Total publications:6 publications

Grant number: ES/V004581/1

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19
  • Known Financial Commitments (USD)

    $607,254.57
  • Funder

    UK Research and Innovation (UKRI)
  • Principal Investigator

    Soo Downe
  • Research Location

    United Kingdom, Netherlands
  • Lead Research Institution

    University of Central Lancashire
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Health Systems Research

  • Research Subcategory

    Health service delivery

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Type

    Non-Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    N/A

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Adults (18 and older)

  • Vulnerable Population

    Pregnant women

  • Occupations of Interest

    Health Personnel

Abstract

Annually, over 1,200,000 UK residents (pregnant women and neonates) need maternity care. All relevant authorities emphasise the critical importance of antenatal, intrapartum, postnatal and neonatal services, birth companionship, keeping mother/baby together, and breastfeeding, even during COVID-19. International disaster reports consistently value community provision. These principles align with NHS England Better Births safety and personalisation policies. UK maternity Trusts have responded differently to COVID-19. Some have reduced tests, contacts, community intrapartum provision, and birth companionship options. These decisions are associated with reports of unattended home births, delays in self-referral for unusual symptoms, and psychological distress. In other Trusts, and in countries such as The Netherlands, increased community care provision, and new innovations (including remote access to tests and contacts) are being trialled. With stakeholders, and using normalisation and behavioural change theories, we will identify which organisational responses have worked best for maternity care organisation during COVID-19. We will undertake policy level UK/Netherlands analyses, using official documents, national level interviews, and a geo-mapped on-line survey of women's experiences before, during and after COVID-19. We will then undertake in-depth maternity/neonatal case studies in 8 UK Trusts, selected on available staffing levels at the crisis peak, and on case-mix. We will include retrospective and prospective documentary reviews, on-line staff and parent interviews, routine clinical outcomes data (including infections), and modelling of what worked to optimise safety and personalisation for women, parents, and staff. A final stakeholder event will co-develop a practical, theoretically informed organisational model for both routine and crisis-affected maternity and neonatal services.

Publicationslinked via Europe PMC

Last Updated:14 hours ago

View all publications at Europe PMC

Assessing safe and personalised maternity and neonatal care through a pandemic: a case study of outcomes and experiences in two trusts in England using the ASPIRE COVID-19 framework.

Making maternity and neonatal care personalised in the COVID-19 pandemic: Results from the Babies Born Better survey in the UK and the Netherlands.

'There's only so much you can be pushed': Magnification of the maternity staffing crisis by the 2020/21 COVID-19 pandemic.

The United Kingdom and the Netherlands maternity care responses to COVID-19: A comparative study.

Companionship for women/birthing people using antenatal and intrapartum care in England during COVID-19: a mixed-methods analysis of national and organisational responses and perspectives.

'Never waste a crisis': a commentary on the COVID-19 pandemic as a driver for innovation in maternity care.