Rethinking the ethics of vaccination
- Funded by British Academy
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: COV19\200862
Grant search
Key facts
- Disease COVID-19
- Known Financial Commitments (USD) $12,496.09
- Funder British Academy
- Principal Investigator Dr. Stephen John
- Research Location United Kingdom
- Lead Research Institution University of Cambridge, Department of History and Philosophy of Science
- Research Priority Alignment N/A
- Research Category - Research to inform ethical issues 
- Research Subcategory - Research to inform ethical issues related to Public Health Measures 
- Special Interest Tags - N/A 
- Study Type - Non-Clinical 
- Clinical Trial Details - N/A 
- Broad Policy Alignment - Pending 
- Age Group - Unspecified 
- Vulnerable Population - Unspecified 
- Occupations of Interest - Unspecified 
Abstract
Politicians and epidemiologists often claim that developing a Covid-19 vaccination is key to combating the pandemic. However, vaccine development and distribution raises difficult ethical questions: how certain must we be that vaccines are safe before using them in the general population? How should we choose whom to vaccinate when we can't vaccinate everyone? Should we make vaccination mandatory? As the high-profile MMR case exemplifies, these problems intersect with public vaccine hesitancy, and, therefore, public trust in science.  These challenges will be even more significant in the case of a Covid-19 vaccine, which will be developed in haste, probably in short supply, and administered against a general backdrop of fear and suspicion. This project aims to use existing philosophical work on vaccination to think through the principles for ethical development and distribution of a Covid-19 vaccine, with the aim of contributing to policies which are fair, effective and trustworthy.