Mitigating the effects of national crisis: the case for a dedicated Civil Defence or Emergency Situations organisation in the United Kingdom
- Funded by British Academy
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: COV19\201075
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Start & end year
N/AKnown Financial Commitments (USD)
$12,893.02Funder
British AcademyPrincipal Investigator
Dr. Rod ThorntonResearch Location
Italy, Russia…Lead Research Institution
King's College London - Defence Studies Department School of Security StudiesResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Secondary impacts of disease, response & control measuresResearch Subcategory
Other secondary impactsSpecial Interest Tags
N/AStudy Type
Non-ClinicalClinical Trial Details
N/ABroad Policy Alignment
PendingAge Group
Adults (18 and older)Vulnerable Population
UnspecifiedOccupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
The United Kingdom was found wanting when the covid-19 pandemic struck. The military had to step in to provide support. Its personnel, for instance, planned and built temporary hospitals, took over the NHS logistics system and ran the vast majority of mobile testing facilities in the country (92 out of 96). The UK government was lucky in that, almost uniquely, a large number of military personnel were available in early 2020. It may not be so lucky next time. Other European countries, though, do not rely on luck. Virtually every one of them has a standing Civil Defence or Emergency Situations body whose sole function it is to deal with sudden national emergencies. This project examines, by comparing and contrasting with other European states badly affected by the pandemic (Italy, Russia and Spain), and which utilised their Civil Defence bodies, whether the UK needs such a body of its own.