Understanding and addressing challenges to informed consent and research compliance during Covid-19 research
- Funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Total publications:1 publications
Grant number: 3R01AG058254-03S1
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Start & end year
20182023Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$235,401Funder
National Institutes of Health (NIH)Principal Investigator
James M DuboisResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
Washington UniversityResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Research to inform ethical issues
Research Subcategory
Research to inform ethical issues in Research
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Adults (18 and older)
Vulnerable Population
Unspecified
Occupations of Interest
Other
Abstract
PROJECT Summary: Within all US and international codes of research ethics, informed consent serves as a cornerstone for theethical conduct of research. The application to our current parent R01, "Implementing Evidence-basedInformed Consent Practices to Address the Risk of Alzheimer's Dementia and Cognitive Impairment in ClinicalTrials" (AG058254) reviewed a large body of literature and concluded that there are several evidence-basedpractices that improve the consent process: using plain language and optimizing consent document layout;assessing understanding of information using a validated instrument; reviewing with participants anyinformation that was misunderstood; and involving surrogate decision-makers as necessary. Our currentparent R01 has 3 specific aims-including development of a web-based toolkit and a social media push-thatcollectively aim to increase the implementation of these evidence-based consent practices (EBCPs).Implementing EBCPs is made more difficult in times of pandemic. Severely ill patients may be unable toconsent, yet quarantine prevents access to surrogates. Electronic consent forms may need to be used,because researchers may not be allowed to enter rooms with patients. These electronic consent forms mayneed to be produced very quickly, with little attention given to plain language and formatting. Consentinformation may be incomplete as information about risks may be very limited. Finally, research during apandemic may lead people to embrace a research ethic that is more strongly focused on the common good(public health) than individual rights. This leads us to propose the following aims in an administrativesupplement that examines research on Covid19.1. Analyze qualitative (open-ended) survey data from IRB members and Covid19 researchers on how current ethical, regulatory, and institutional requirements might pose barriers to urgent Covid19 research, and what accommodations would facilitate such research. Relevant to the current R01, we will engage in text mining and model building to explore the issues arising from the need for informed consent, waivers of consent, or permissions for use of human subject data and biospecimens.2. Review findings from the survey of IRB members and Covid19 researchers to guide adaptation and expansion of the parent R01's EBCP toolkit and implementation trial. We anticipate that this will entail providing guidance on electronic informed consent processes and alternatives to legally authorized representatives when patients lack the ability to consent to research.3. Explore the policy implications of the project, and broadly disseminate data and findings. We will publish a special issue of the journal, Narrative Inquiry in Bioethics, publish our findings in peer reviewed journals, and anonymize and deposit data in the ICPSR data repository at the University of Michigan.
Publicationslinked via Europe PMC
Last Updated:2 days ago
View all publications at Europe PMC