Comparative Effectiveness of Single-Site and Scattered-Site Permanent Supportive Housing on Patient-Centered and COVID-19 Related Outcomes for People Experiencing Homelessness
- Funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: unknown
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$2,584,606Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstitutePrincipal Investigator
PhD. Benjamin HenwoodResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
University of Southern CaliforniaResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Infection prevention and control
Research Subcategory
Restriction measures to prevent secondary transmission in communities
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Unspecified
Vulnerable Population
Other
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
Project Summary Background and Significance: People experiencing homelessness (PEH) have an increased risk of contracting the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) and are at a higher risk of COVID-19-related hospitalization and death due to increased vulnerability and known comorbidities. Consequently, the recent pandemic has made housing for PEH a top priority. Permanent supportive housing (PSH) programs that provide access to living and support services are the most effective approach for serving PSH, but it is not known what type of PSH programs can best address COVID-19-related risk. Study Aims: This study aims to test the comparative effectiveness of place-based PSH (PB-PSH) and scattered-site PSH (SS-PSH) on PEH quality of life and whether COVID-19 related health behaviors act as a mediator in this relationship. In addition, this study aims to learn PEH adherence to social distancing guidelines and provider perspectives on challenges of implementing and sustaining COVID-19 related prevention practices and care in PSH