Developing Methods for Comparing Outcomes Across Patient Groups in Observational Studies
- Funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: unknown
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$349,999Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstitutePrincipal Investigator
PhD. Laine ThomasResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
Duke University School of MedicineResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
13
Research Subcategory
N/A
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Unspecified
Vulnerable Population
Unspecified
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
This enhancement seeks to develop and apply subgroup analysis methods developed in the primary project to overcome limitations and biases in clinical trial and observational data in their representation of subgroups and the at-large target population. These methods use small trial and observational study findings about different medication treatment effects on COVID-19 outcomes and apply these findings to target populations and important subgroups. The enhancement will Establish criteria and develop a tool to facilitate rigorous assessment of observational treatment comparisons in the setting of COVID-19 Illustrate application of those criteria and tools to critically evaluate and interpret comparative effectiveness analyses of three COVID-19-related therapies using claims data on safety and efficacy outcomes