Comparing Two Ways to Help Clinicians and Older Patients Make Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions

  • Funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Total publications:0 publications

Grant number: unknown

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19
  • Known Financial Commitments (USD)

    $322,749
  • Funder

    Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
  • Principal Investigator

    PhD. Karen Sepucha
  • Research Location

    United States of America
  • Lead Research Institution

    Massachusetts General Hospital
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Secondary impacts of disease, response & control measures

  • Research Subcategory

    Indirect health impacts

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Type

    Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    Not applicable

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Adults (18 and older)

  • Vulnerable Population

    Unspecified

  • Occupations of Interest

    Unspecified

Abstract

The enhancement addresses important two issues: how do healthcare systems deal with the growing backlog of screening tests and elective procedures due to the pandemic and what is the impact on attitudes about COVID-19 risk, willingness to screen for colorectal cancer using alternate methods, time to screening, and barriers to screening for patients who had their colonoscopy delayed due to the pandemic. The enhancement will compare the effectiveness of a shared decision making versus standard scheduling approach for patients on the wait list for rescheduling postponed screening and surveillance colonoscopy procedures. The results from this enhancement will build knowledge about patients' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences for colorectal cancer screening as health care systems return to routine operations during the COVID-19 pandemic.