Comparing Two Ways to Help Clinicians and Older Patients Make Colorectal Cancer Screening Decisions
- Funded by Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: unknown
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$322,749Funder
Patient-Centered Outcomes Research InstitutePrincipal Investigator
PhD. Karen SepuchaResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
Massachusetts General HospitalResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Secondary impacts of disease, response & control measures
Research Subcategory
Indirect health impacts
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
Not applicable
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Adults (18 and older)
Vulnerable Population
Unspecified
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
The enhancement addresses important two issues: how do healthcare systems deal with the growing backlog of screening tests and elective procedures due to the pandemic and what is the impact on attitudes about COVID-19 risk, willingness to screen for colorectal cancer using alternate methods, time to screening, and barriers to screening for patients who had their colonoscopy delayed due to the pandemic. The enhancement will compare the effectiveness of a shared decision making versus standard scheduling approach for patients on the wait list for rescheduling postponed screening and surveillance colonoscopy procedures. The results from this enhancement will build knowledge about patients' knowledge, attitudes, and preferences for colorectal cancer screening as health care systems return to routine operations during the COVID-19 pandemic.