Multi-Wave 50-State COVID-19 Survey: Empowering a National Response
- Funded by Russell Sage Foundation
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: unknown
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19start year
2020Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$50,000Funder
Russell Sage FoundationPrincipal Investigator
Matthew Baum, David Lazer, Katherine OgnyanovaResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
N/AResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience
Research Subcategory
Communication
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Unspecified
Vulnerable Population
Unspecified
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
Political scientist Matthew Baum and his colleagues hypothesize that the COVID-19 pandemic will permanently change the trajectory of our social, economic, and political systems. They will conduct two additional monthly surveys in a series of state surveys conducted since April 2020 with previous NSF support. The January and March 2021 monthly waves will capture opinions, behaviors, and circumstances in the post-election period. The investigators will also merge Twitter data for about 15,000 survey respondents with survey data to examine information seeking, attitudes, and behaviors around COVID-19. The project has two objectives: 1) producing information for improving the national response to COVID-19; and 2) using COVID-19 data to understand how people, especially those in vulnerable communities, adapt to and make sense of a pandemic that has disrupted their daily lives. The investigators will assess differences over time within and between states, by geography, socioeconomic status, race, gender, and other dimensions. They will also evaluate the information needs and social barriers confronting different individuals and communities. They will also evaluate how variations in COVID-19 circumstances locally are associated with preferences, behaviors, and approval of local, state and federal government responses to the pandemic. For example, they can examine how spikes in the virus are associated with changes in the approval of governors and the President, or the extent to which attributions of blame are associated with partisanship. They can also evaluate the mismatch between public opinion and policy choices at the state level. Using variation over time of cases/deaths, policies, and preferences will allow them to disentangle mechanisms of democratic accountability.