Response to COVID-19 Pandemic in Kenya: Tracking evidence based actions and policy decisions at all levels of government

Grant number: unknown

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19
  • Principal Investigator

    Unspecified Purity Rima Mbaabu
  • Research Location

    Kenya
  • Lead Research Institution

    N/A
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience

  • Research Subcategory

    Policy research and interventions

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Type

    Non-Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    N/A

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Unspecified

  • Vulnerable Population

    Unspecified

  • Occupations of Interest

    Unspecified

Abstract

Occasioned by the outbreak of COVID-19, many global economies went into massive shock. As a global emergency, immediate response was needed through policy decisions. Such decisions in various jurisdictions are critical owing to the pandemic`s multi-sectoral impacts particularly the massive loss of human lives. Policy decisions need to be based on scientific evidence, which was initially lacking for the novel COVID-19. The purpose of this case study is to assess COVID-19 related evidence that informed policy decisions and hence responses to the pandemic in Kenya. Moreover, the case study will assess the enablers and barriers to utilisation of knowledge for policy. A combination of methods - document analysis, semi-structured interviews and questionnaires will be used to collect the data. We aim to gather data through a survey at national level ( from all the government ministries) and all the 47 County governments. A linear model approach such as the one proposed by DEFRA 2006 or Landry et al., 2001 will be used to assess knowledge utilisation across key levels of government. The study will provide an understanding on the extent to which policy decisions and response to COVID-19 relied on the availed scientific evidence, the factors that promoted or impeded this uptake of knowledge as well as evidence pathways.