Cross Cutting Social Science Research for COVID-19
- Funded by Wellcome Trust
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: 222037/Z/20/Z
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19, Disease XStart & end year
20202022Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$457,209.23Funder
Wellcome TrustPrincipal Investigator
Dr. Nina GobatResearch Location
United KingdomLead Research Institution
University of OxfordResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience
Research Subcategory
Policy research and interventions
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Unspecified
Vulnerable Population
Unspecified
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
The global community has mobilised in an unprecedented way to deliver research in response to the threat of COVID-19. In February 2020, priority areas for research were advanced under a coordinated mechanism convened by the World Health Organisation. For social science a cross cutting research agenda was proposed in recognition of the vital role played by individuals, communities and populations worldwide in slowing disease tranmssison and providing care for COVID-19 and beyond. Research initiatives, including over 300 social science studies funded by GloPID-R members alone, have been advanced against these social science priorities. Building on earlier successes in supporting epidemic-relevant research, the research arm of GOARN, the Global Outbreak Alert and Response Network, has actively coordinated this work with WHO. There is a pressing need to properly resource coordination and knowledge mobilisation of epidemic-relevant social science research. Further, there is an important opportunity to leverage the reach and expertise of GOARN and establish infrastructure for the COVID-19 response as well as for future scenarios to ensure that structures for epidemic-relevant research can take hold: the well worn phrase of building the ship while we sail it is unsustainable as an effective and efficient research response to infectious disease epidemics.