Structural harms and COVID-19 policy responses in Manitoba: Exploring the experiences of Red River Métis

  • Funded by Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Total publications:0 publications

Grant number: 459196

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19
  • start year

    2021
  • Known Financial Commitments (USD)

    $394,183.55
  • Funder

    Canadian Institutes of Health Research (CIHR)
  • Principal Investigator

    Driedger S Michelle, Chartrand Frances, Nickel Nathan C, Sanguins Julianne
  • Research Location

    Canada
  • Lead Research Institution

    University of Manitoba
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience

  • Research Subcategory

    Approaches to public health interventions

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Type

    Non-Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    N/A

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Unspecified

  • Vulnerable Population

    Indigenous People

  • Occupations of Interest

    Unspecified

Abstract

Why this research is needed: Systematically marginalized populations, such as First Nations/Métis/Inuit (FN/M/I), have been greatly affected by COVID-19 in Canada. This is why people identifying as FN/M/I were prioritized for COVID-19 vaccines. This policy was adopted Canada-wide, except in Manitoba. In Manitoba, only First Nations Peoples were prioritized for COVID-19 vaccines. Inuit and Métis Citizens were to access COVID-19 vaccines following age-eligibility criteria like all other Manitobans. This policy changed in May 2021 in acknowledgement of the "impacts of colonization on all Indigenous people in Canada". Vaccines were handled differently during H1N1, where only Manitoba prioritized people of Indigenous Ancestry (FN/I/M) for H1N1 vaccine in Canada. Manitoba's COVID-19 vaccine policy has had a negative impact on vaccine uptake by the Red River Métis. In this project we aim to study: 1.Ongoing COVID-19 vaccine decision-making processes among Métis Citizens; 2.Harms (e.g. COVID-19 infection rates, health service use for COVID-19, lower vaccine uptake) created by a racist policy that disadvantaged Métis relative to all other Manitobans; 3.The impact on possible COVID-19 cases if Red River Métis had been prioritized for vaccination earlier in the pandemic; and 4.Long-term consequences and possible loss of trust among Métis in provincial health systems. Methods: We will carry out focus group discussions with Red River Métis (obj 1, 2, 4) to examine Métis experiences given the provincial public health COVID response, and use whole-population administrative health and COVID vaccination data, updated monthly, to compare Métis experiences to all other Manitobans (obj 2, 3). Impact: As we enter the fourth wave, we need to document the experiences of Red River Métis relative to all other Manitobans. Only then might we be able to better understand how we can close the gap in Métis vaccine uptake.