Return to homepagePandemic Pact

Misinformation and COVID-19-related health measures in displacement settings

Grant number: misinformation-and-covid-19-related-health-measures-in-displacement-settings

Grant search

Key facts

  • Disease

    COVID-19
  • Start & end year

    2020
    2022
  • Known Financial Commitments (USD)

    $102,610.38
  • Funder

    997
  • Principal Investigator

    N/A

  • Research Location

    18, Kenya
  • Lead Research Institution

    Busara Center for Behavioral Economics
  • Research Priority Alignment

    N/A
  • Research Category

    Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience

  • Research Subcategory

    Communication

  • Special Interest Tags

    N/A

  • Study Type

    Non-Clinical

  • Clinical Trial Details

    N/A

  • Broad Policy Alignment

    Pending

  • Age Group

    Unspecified

  • Vulnerable Population

    Internally Displaced and Migrants

  • Occupations of Interest

    Unspecified

Abstract

How and in what ways does misinformation influence uptake and adherence to public health measures for prevention, control and treatment of COVID-19? How are these dynamics shaped by the experience of displacement and the environment of a displacement settlement? Principal Investigator: Dr Mareike Schomerus (Busara Center for Behavioral Economics) Research Snapshot: Misinformation and Covid-19-related health measures in displacement settings This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), explored whether manipulating the source of public health information during the COVID-19 pandemic would shift the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of refugees and internally displaced persons. View snapshot WHAT DID THE STUDY SET OUT TO ACHIEVE? This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), explored whether manipulating the source of public health information during the COVID-19 pandemic would shift the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of refugees and internally displaced persons. While the research questions could not be answered, the study generated useful insights for researchers interested in similar questions. What were the key findings? Public health information is usually intended to influence people's behaviour, but this outcome may depend on whether audiences perceive the source as trustworthy. Manipulating the source should therefore affect outcomes. But, as this pilot study in Beni, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) demonstrated, doing this is not easy. Attribution of attitude or behaviour changes to the source manipulation was not possible. Learning and recommendations for how source-labelled information can be delivered more effectively in humanitarian settings were documented for the benefit of those who might conduct similar evaluations in future. Researchers or humanitarian programme staff could use learning from this study to test their Theory of Change prior to conducting a similar evaluation.