Misinformation and COVID-19-related health measures in displacement settings
- Funded by 997
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: misinformation-and-covid-19-related-health-measures-in-displacement-settings
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
COVID-19Start & end year
20202022Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$102,610.38Funder
997Principal Investigator
N/A
Research Location
18, KenyaLead Research Institution
Busara Center for Behavioral EconomicsResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Policies for public health, disease control & community resilience
Research Subcategory
Communication
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Unspecified
Vulnerable Population
Internally Displaced and Migrants
Occupations of Interest
Unspecified
Abstract
How and in what ways does misinformation influence uptake and adherence to public health measures for prevention, control and treatment of COVID-19? How are these dynamics shaped by the experience of displacement and the environment of a displacement settlement? Principal Investigator: Dr Mareike Schomerus (Busara Center for Behavioral Economics) Research Snapshot: Misinformation and Covid-19-related health measures in displacement settings This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), explored whether manipulating the source of public health information during the COVID-19 pandemic would shift the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of refugees and internally displaced persons. View snapshot WHAT DID THE STUDY SET OUT TO ACHIEVE? This pilot randomized controlled trial (RCT), explored whether manipulating the source of public health information during the COVID-19 pandemic would shift the attitudes, knowledge and behaviour of refugees and internally displaced persons. While the research questions could not be answered, the study generated useful insights for researchers interested in similar questions. What were the key findings? Public health information is usually intended to influence people's behaviour, but this outcome may depend on whether audiences perceive the source as trustworthy. Manipulating the source should therefore affect outcomes. But, as this pilot study in Beni, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) demonstrated, doing this is not easy. Attribution of attitude or behaviour changes to the source manipulation was not possible. Learning and recommendations for how source-labelled information can be delivered more effectively in humanitarian settings were documented for the benefit of those who might conduct similar evaluations in future. Researchers or humanitarian programme staff could use learning from this study to test their Theory of Change prior to conducting a similar evaluation.