Differential filovirus glycoprotein inhibition by interferon signaling
- Funded by National Institutes of Health (NIH)
- Total publications:0 publications
Grant number: 1R21AI200314-01
Grant search
Key facts
Disease
Ebola, Marburg virus diseaseStart & end year
20262028Known Financial Commitments (USD)
$233,250Funder
National Institutes of Health (NIH)Principal Investigator
PROFESSOR Wendy MauryResearch Location
United States of AmericaLead Research Institution
UNIVERSITY OF IOWAResearch Priority Alignment
N/A
Research Category
Pathogen: natural history, transmission and diagnostics
Research Subcategory
Pathogen morphology, shedding & natural history
Special Interest Tags
N/A
Study Type
Non-Clinical
Clinical Trial Details
N/A
Broad Policy Alignment
Pending
Age Group
Not Applicable
Vulnerable Population
Not applicable
Occupations of Interest
Not applicable
Abstract
Abstract: In recent studies, we have demonstrated that viruses encoding Marburg virus (MARV) glycoprotein (GP) are less sensitive to type I and II interferon (IFN)-dependent inhibition than the same viruses encoding Ebola virus (EBOV) GP. Our preliminary findings indicate that one or more interferon stimulated genes (ISGs) inhibits EBOV GP dependent entry, but not MARV-dependent entry. Our new-found appreciation for the differential IFN control of viruses encoding EBOV and MARV GPs identifies an additional layer of complexity to the ongoing war between filoviruses and host innate immunity. Identifying ISG(s) that selectively restrict EBOV, but not MARV, would yield fundamental insights into the molecular determinants of species barriers to filovirus infection, inform the mechanisms underlying viral spillover events, and highlight potential targets for therapeutic intervention. This application seeks to elucidate those interactions and may identify new strategies for combating the episodic, devastating outbreaks caused by these viruses. During these proposed Aim 1 studies, we will characterize which human and mouse cells inhibit EBOV GP, but not MARV GP, dependent entry when pretreated with type I or II IFN. We will also define which filovirus GPs are sensitive to IFN pretreatment. In Aim 2, we will use two different strategies to identify and characterize host factors that are responsible for this differential effect on filovirus GPs. By the successful completion of these studies, a clear understanding of a newly appreciated mechanism of IFN inhibition of EBOV GP entry will be achieved. These studies are significant and innovative as they investigate a previously unappreciated antiviral mechanism that controls entry of some, but not other, members of this deadly family of viruses. These studies may provide the basis for future antiviral approaches.